100％合格率のISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager関連日本語版問題集試験-試験の準備方法-信頼的なISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager受験対策
P.S. JpexamがGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBRgfUFKf5Uie5zXcH2gS-TlHNqf_Nnb
ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager練習問題は、試験に必要な人向けの安定した信頼できる試験問題プロバイダーです。 私たちは長い間市場にとどまって成長してきました。ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerトレーニングブレインダンプの優れた品質と高い合格率のため、私たちは常にここにいます。 安全な環境と効果的な製品については、数千人の候補者が当社のISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager学習ガイドを選択する用意があります。ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager学習教材を試してみてください。
PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager 認定試験の出題範囲：
トピック
出題範囲
トピック 1
トピック 2
トピック 3
>> ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager関連日本語版問題集 <<
効果的ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager｜更新するISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager関連日本語版問題集試験｜試験の準備方法PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager受験対策
JpexamがPECB認証ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager試験対策ツールのサイトで開発した問題集はとてもPECB認証試験の受験生に適用します。Jpexamが提供した研修ツールが対応性的なので君の貴重な時間とエネルギーを節約できます。
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager 認定 ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager 試験問題 (Q42-Q47):
質問 # 42
Scenario 7: Located in central London, Konzolo has become a standout innovator in the cryptocurrency field.
By introducing its unique cryptocurrency, Konzolo has contributed to the variety of digital currencies and prioritized enhancing the security and reliability of its offerings.
Konzolo aimed to enhance its systems but faced challenges in monitoring the security of its own and third- party systems. These issues became especially evident during an incident that caused several hours of server downtime This downtime was primarily caused by a third-party service provider that failed to uphold strong security measures, allowing unauthorized access.
In response to this critical situation, Konzolo strengthened its information security infrastructure. The company initiated a comprehensive vulnerability scan of its cryptographic wallet software, a cornerstone of its digital currency offerings The scan revealed a critical vulnerability due to the software using outdated encryption algorithms that are susceptible to decryption by modern methods that posed a significant risk of asset exposure Noah, the IT manager, played a central role in this discovery With careful attention to detail, he documented the vulnerability and communicated the findings to the incident response team and management.
Acknowledging the need for expertise in navigating the complexities of information security incident management. Konzolo welcomed Paulina to the team. After addressing the vulnerability and updating the cryptographic algorithms, they recognized the importance of conducting a thorough investigation to prevent future vulnerabilities. This marked the stage for Paulina s crucial involvement. She performed a detailed forensic analysis of the incident, employing automated and manual methods during the collection phase. Her analysis provided crucial insights into the security breach, enabling Konzolo to understand the depth of the vulnerability and the actions required to mitigate it.
Paulina also played a crucial role in the reporting phase, as her comprehensive approach extended beyond analysis. By defining clear and actionable steps for future prevention and response, she contributed significantly to developing a resilient information security incident management system based on ISO/IEC
27035-1 and 27035-2 guidelines. This strategic initiative marked a significant milestone in Konzolo's quest to strengthen its defenses against cyber threats Based on scenario 7, which phase of forensic analysis did Paulina fail to conduct correctly?
正解：A
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
As detailed in scenario 7 and reinforced in the previous question, Paulina began her forensic work after the system was restored-missing the critical Collection phase as defined in ISO/IEC 27043 and referenced in ISO/IEC 27035-2.
Forensic collection involves gathering volatile and non-volatile data (e.g., logs, RAM dumps, file artifacts) at the earliest possible moment in the incident lifecycle to avoid data loss. By waiting until after recovery, she likely compromised the chain of custody and the completeness of her evidence.
The scenario notes that her analysis and reporting were thorough, providing valuable insights and mitigation strategies. Thus, the failure lies in the timing and execution of the Collection phase.
Reference:
* ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 6.4.2 and 7.2.3: "Collection activities should begin immediately upon identifying a potential incident and before recovery begins."
* ISO/IEC 27043:2015, Clause 8.2.1: "Forensic collection is critical to ensuring reliable analysis and admissible evidence." Correct answer: A
-
-
質問 # 43
Scenario 7: Located in central London, Konzolo has become a standout innovator in the cryptocurrency field.
The company faced challenges monitoring the security of its own and third-party systems. An incident involving server downtime exposed vulnerabilities in a third-party service provider's security posture, leading to unauthorized access.
In response, Konzolo launched a thorough vulnerability scan of its cryptographic wallet software and uncovered critical weaknesses due to outdated encryption algorithms. Noah, the IT manager, documented and communicated the findings. Paulina was brought in to lead a forensic investigation, provide actionable insights, and help enhance the company's overall incident response strategy based on ISO/IEC 27035 standards.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which of the following steps for effective security monitoring did Konzolo NOT adhere to?
正解：C
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016 and ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016 emphasize the importance of monitoring not only internal systems but also third-party or outsourced services. Clause 7.3.2 of ISO/IEC 27035-2 specifically recommends that organizations establish mechanisms for the continuous monitoring of service providers and outsourced systems, particularly when such services process or store sensitive information.
In the scenario, Konzolo suffered an incident due to a failure by a third-party service provider to uphold security controls. This indicates that Konzolo had insufficient or no effective monitoring of outsourced services in place, which directly contributed to the breach and system downtime.
On the other hand:
Option A is incorrect because Konzolo did conduct a vulnerability scan, identifying and addressing cryptographic weaknesses.
Option B is also incorrect, as Paulina conducted forensic and behavioral analysis (both manual and automated) as part of the investigation process.
Reference Extracts:
ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 7.3.2: "Monitoring should not be limited to internal infrastructure but should include third-party and outsourced services to ensure that they are operating within defined security parameters." ISO/IEC 27002:2022, Control 5.23: "Information security should be addressed in agreements with third parties." Correct answer: C
-
質問 # 44
Based on the categorization of information security incidents, incidents such as abuse of rights, denial of actions, and misoperations are categorized as:
正解：A
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
ISO/IEC 27035-1 classifies incidents into several categories based on the nature of their impact. Incidents involving the abuse of user rights, denial of authorized activities, or improper system use are considered violations of internal policies or rules. These fall under the category of "Breach of Rule" incidents.
This category emphasizes that while data or functionality may not be directly compromised, internal governance, permissions, or acceptable use policies have been violated. These incidents are crucial to detect as they often indicate insider threats or misconfigured permissions.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016, Annex A.2.3: "Breach of Rule" incidents include abuse of privileges, unauthorized activities, and actions violating organizational policies.
Correct answer: C
-
質問 # 45
Why is it important to identify all impacted hosts during the eradication phase?
正解：A
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
During the eradication phase of the information security incident management process, identifying all impacted hosts is essential to ensure that every element affected by the incident is addressed before proceeding to recovery. According to ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 6.4.5, the eradication phase involves removing malware, disabling unauthorized access, and remediating vulnerabilities that led to the incident.
Identifying all impacted hosts ensures:
Comprehensive removal of malicious artifacts
Prevention of reinfection or further propagation
A smooth and complete transition into the recovery phase
This directly supports recovery planning because it helps teams understand which systems need to be restored, rebuilt, or validated. Option B (optimizing hardware performance) is not a goal of incident management, and Option C (enhancing overall security) is a long-term objective but not the immediate goal of the eradication phase.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 6.4.5: "During eradication, it is important to identify all affected systems so that root causes and malicious components are removed prior to recovery." Correct answer: A
-
質問 # 46
Scenario 6: EastCyber has established itself as a premier cyber security company that offers threat detection, vulnerability assessment, and penetration testing tailored to protect organizations from emerging cyber threats. The company effectively utilizes ISO/IEC 27035-1 and 27035-2 standards, enhancing its capability to manage information security incidents.
EastCyber appointed an information security management team led by Mike. Despite limited resources, Mike and the team implemented advanced monitoring protocols to ensure that every device within the company's purview is under constant surveillance. This monitoring approach is crucial for covering everything thoroughly, enabling the information security and cyber management team to proactively detect and respond to any sign of unauthorized access, modifications, or malicious activity within its systems and networks.
A recent incident involving unauthorized access to company phones highlighted the critical nature of incident management. Nate, the incident coordinator, quickly prepared an exhaustive incident report. His report detailed an analysis of the situation, identifying the problem and its cause. In response to the incident, EastCyber addressed the exploited vulnerabilities. This action started the eradication phase, aimed at systematically eliminating the elements of the incident.
Based on scenario 6, answer the following:
EastCyber decided to address vulnerabilities exploited during an incident as part of the eradication phase, to eradicate the elements of the incident. Is this approach acceptable?
正解：C
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
According to ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016 and ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, the eradication phase of incident management is defined as the stage in which the causes and components of the incident-such as malware, unauthorized access points, or system vulnerabilities-are completely removed or neutralized.
Clause 6.4.5 of ISO/IEC 27035-2 clearly outlines that the eradication phase includes actions to eliminate the root causes of incidents, which may include fixing exploited vulnerabilities and removing malicious code.
This ensures that the underlying issues that allowed the incident to occur are effectively resolved, reducing the risk of recurrence.
While containment aims to limit the damage and prevent the spread of an incident, it is not intended for remediation of vulnerabilities. Similarly, the recovery phase focuses on restoring services and returning systems to normal operations after the threat has been eradicated.
Reference Extracts:
ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 6.4.5: "The eradication phase includes removing the root cause of the incident (e.g., patching vulnerabilities, deleting malware, and closing open ports)." Clause 6.4.3: "Containment is primarily focused on limiting the scope and impact, not resolving root causes." Correct answer: A
質問 # 47
......
ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager試験準備は専門家によって作成され、お客様がISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager試験に合格し、短時間で証明書を取得するのに非常に役立ちます。購入前にISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerガイドブレインダンプの品質を知りたい場合は、ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager試験問題のデモを無料でダウンロードできます。 ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Managerトレーニングガイドが証明書の取得に役立つことを確認できます。私たちを信じて、ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager試験トレントを学ぼうとすると、予期しない結果が得られます。
ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager受験対策: https://www.jpexam.com/ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager_exam.html
2025年Jpexamの最新ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager PDFダンプおよびISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CBRgfUFKf5Uie5zXcH2gS-TlHNqf_Nnb